Industry expert and L&L founder Mike Fairley recently hosted a webinar dedicated to digital label printing technology. Here we publish his responses to two questions posed during the webinar.
Q: Of the current installations, are there a percentage that end users have installed on their own sites, instead of using a converter?
Dudley Fay, procurement category manager, global demand print, Diagio
Mike Fairley: To my knowledge there are no HP Indigo liquid toner or Xeikon dry toner presses installed in end user facilities. These machines are mostly used for higher quality work which includes over-varnishing and die-cutting (often gold foiling, etc) and require a level of skill from operators for set-up and running.
Inkjet is slightly different. Using UV inks means that over-varnishing may not be required for many label jobs. If the label sizes are continually the same size, then the complexity of regularly changing die-cutters is much reduced. This is the case particularly in the pharmaceutical industry, and I know that EFI Jetrion has now installed some inkjet presses in pharma companies. Printing is usually in only 2/3 colors so that also helps.
The other route that has some installations is where label converters have installed a digital label press in their customer's plant and they then manage the label printing in-house for the end user.
Q: If the cost of flexography printing can be cut in half, will this reduce the growth rate of digital presses?
Q: What is the main advantage of electrophotographic digital labels versus inkjet digital label production? How about in five years?
James Buntain, chief technology officer, Eastman Kodak Company
Mike Fairley: In response to the first question: in my view, no. The cost of digital (essentially the consumables) is already more expensive than flexo. It is not so much to do with printed label cost, it is more to do with adding value and service to the label business. Run lengths are decreasing all the time; companies are reducing stock holding of printed labels, they are rationalizing their supply chains, looking to do more versions, etc.
The way to make digital label printing profitable is nothing to do with selling on price. Successful digital label printers make their profit from adding value and service, such as: reducing lead times, on-demand printing, managing supply chains, test marketing, short run proofing, producing multi-versions or variations, and production flexibility.
Additionally, the average label print run for digitally printed labels is currently under 10,000 labels. Again, it is difficult to make flexo profitable at this level. Label converting plants with both flexo and digital mostly claim to make most of their profit from digital.
With regard to the second question: the dominant digital label technology today is HP Indigo, with probably around 80 percent of the total installed 1,200 worldwide base. They have succeeded because of excellent marketing – they undertake feasibility studies with converters, work out their break-evens and investment payback time. They can offer color guaranteed printing. They have a wider color gamut than conventional printing. They give excellent after-sale support.
Color drop-on-demand inkjet arrived some ten years later and has – up until now – been perceived as of lower quality and performance. That, I think, is now starting to change. Quality of reproduction, enhanced definition, better inks, the introduction of white inks, etc, are all making the process more saleable and installations are now starting to grow more rapidly. The fact that some very big suppliers with global reputations (Durst, Domino, Epson, for example) are entering the market is also now changing the perception of performance, quality, support, etc. New inkjet technology, such as the Memjet engine shown at Ipex, which has 70,400 nozzles and claims photographic quality, will undoubtedly also change the perception of inkjet. Initial forecasts that I have seen seem to indicate that inkjet will grow rapidly over the next five years.
There are now something like 30 different digital makes and models of inkjet label presses on the market. Not all will survive, but the market leaders will probably grow fast and succeed rapidly. The Digital Label Summit coming up in
To comment please sign in.
If you are not yet a member then register here
Blog
Get involved and have your say
Digital takes its seat at the table
The Digital Label Summit revealed that digital has become a mainstream printing technology, taking its place alongside letterpress, flexography, screen and offset. ... more >>
Labelexpo Trendwatch
Danielle Jerschefske highlights some new technology and feature areas of the show to look out for at Labelexpo Americas in Chicago in September. ... more >>
Latin American summit demonstrates growth possibilities
At Label Summit Latin America, three very interesting themes emerged which will be of interest to label converters globally as we move out of the recession. ... more >>
Label News in your inbox
Subscribe now
Our Publications
-
-
-
Yearbook
Comment and analysis from the industry’s leaders, covering the latest trends and technologies
-







The comments
Mike, The last conversation I had with Danielle, I expressed to her that your publication appears to be the marketing arm of HP in the label industry. This appears to be yet another commercial for HP. Have you all considered sitting down with the companies who have sold their Digital presses? Don't get me wrong, I think we will own another digital press of some sort in the future. Hopefully one that runs in unison with our existing equipment and is not a two press requirement as all of the HP Indigo systems are currently. I have repsonses to each of your benefit statements for using an HP if you care to hear more, just call. Thanks
Sorry for not responding to your comments sooner. I have been away attending the FINAT label congress in Valencia.
I must say that I am somewhat surprised by your comments. Over the past year or so I have written articles about Xeikon, Durst, Domino and Memjet technology - the last two are due to appear in the next issue of Labels & Labeling. I have regular contact with all those companies, as well as HP, and many of these companies' customers, and probably have as good an independent feel of the evolution, development and acceptance of digital label printing as anybody in the industry. Indeed, I make my living from being an independent consultant to the label industry, and to Tarsus.
Having chaired many of the panel sessions at the Digital Label Summit last year and at Labelexpo - and will be again this year - I have listened to and questioned dozens of label converters about their experiences with HP, Xeikon, EFI Jetrion and other label presses. I believe my comments in the blog were therefore fair and objective and based on extensive user feedback. It is also accurate to state that HP Indigo is the dominant installed technology today. One paragraph about HP hardly makes me the marketing arm of the company.
As far as Labels & Labeling is concerned, the magazine again aims to be objective and independent of any manufacturer. If you have a different view to the editorial, or my blog and comments, then add this to your blog comment, or write a piece for the magazine. I'm sure the industry would be interested to hear it.
Mike Fairley
Mike,
I too was surprised by Steve's comments - he clearly doesn't like the fact that HP-Indigo is by far the biggest player in the digital segment and will therefore dominate the press accordingly - at least until somebody else steps up and gains reasonable market share.
It also appears he's not a very happy Indigo user - but to accuse you of being HP's marketing arm is (apart from being downright offensive) far from the truth. Having looked around his website, it claims that runs of over 2,000 labels are better done using flexo - which may indicate more about the business approach than the technology. Having done many "long runs" in excess of 200,000 per version on Indigos at Lightning Labels, I can attest to their suitability for much more than short-run work - not to mention extremely profitable if the pricing is done correctly.
Keep up the good work Mike - you're without question the most informed and independent observer in the industry and deserve the respect of all professional label printers.
Steve Smith
(former owner, Lightning Labels)
Hi Mike and Steve,
I have read all of your comments on digital label printing and found it very useful. Briefly to introduce myself, I am student and conducting a survey for a local printer. Therefore I would like to ask some questions to you, if possible. Is it possible for me to reach you from your personnal contacts?
with kind regards
Teoman